Blog

AMSL Aero founders Andrew Moore and Siobhan Lyndon with their electric aircraft Vertiia. Credit Peter Morris/sydneyheads.com

Australian company, AMSL Aero, is launching a new hydrogen-powered aircraft into the skies! This exciting technology could help the airline industry reach net zero carbon production by 2050. In fact, the Australian government has just published a national strategy on how hydrogen can help the entire country reach net zero.

Note: Scientists and politicians often use the phrase “net zero” when talking about climate change, but what does it mean? The “zero” means zero increase in greenhouse gases in the air. To get to net zero, we need to make less greenhouse gases, and also we need to take greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere. “Net” means these two solutions add up to zero change overall.

Used as rocket fuel, hydrogen is a lightweight gas that stores a lot of energy. Better yet, using hydrogen as fuel doesn’t give off any greenhouse gases. ASML Aero have designed a new hydrogen-powered aircraft that makes zero greenhouse gases. And it could be carrying passengers long distances as soon as 2027.

“We see hydrogen as a game changer for us to allow that longer range of 1,000 kilometres non-stop,” says Siobhan Lyndon, co-founder of AMSL Aero. This is over six times further than similar aircraft powered by electric batteries.

A green and white plane with several helicopter-like propellers

AMSL Aero’s Vertiia aircraft takes off like a helicopter but flies like a plane. Credit: AMSL Aero

Hydrogen can be made by splitting water (H2O) into hydrogen and oxygen using a device called an electrolyser. The electrolyser needs a lot of electricity to make hydrogen, but this could come from renewable sources, like wind and solar. Using renewable sources to make hydrogen fuel is what makes AMSL Aero’s Vertiia carbon neutral. 

The Australian government is taking renewable hydrogen a step further by planning how this fuel could help the entire country go carbon neutral. A key part of the strategy is using hydrogen to make wind and solar more consistent.

One of the big problems with wind and solar is that they make electricity in bursts. Sometimes wind and solar generate extra energy above what’s needed, but sometimes they produce less.

Here’s where hydrogen comes in: when wind and solar make extra energy, this electricity can power electrolysers that make hydrogen. Later, when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing, we could use that hydrogen to make electricity. This way, everyone gets the electricity they need, and it all comes from renewable sources!

Engineer with tablet computer on a background of Green Hydrogen factory

Renewable hydrogen harnesses wind and solar power to make fuel. Credit: ©iStock.com/Scharfsinn86

Renewable hydrogen is exciting, but a lot still needs to happen before we can use it to reach net zero. There are technology challenges to solve, like making electrolysers more efficient and storing large amounts of hydrogen. We need to build hydrogen storage tanks and large networks of pipes to move it around. We also need to educate enough people on how to work with hydrogen.

The new National Hydrogen Strategy outlines solutions to these challenges. They reckon that a shared effort could see Australia meet net zero by 2050 and even sell extra hydrogen to other countries. This strategy is all about setting Australia up to become a renewable energy superpower!

6 responses

  1. Alan Melbourne Avatar
    Alan Melbourne

    I think they are unaware that water vapour is a potent greenhouse gas! That is amazing!

    1. David Shaw Avatar
      David Shaw

      Hi Alan,
      Thanks for the comment! You’re technically correct – using hydrogen produces water vapour, and water vapour is a greenhouse gas. But luckily, it doesn’t stay around as vapour for long. Scientists reckon it takes about two weeks on average for water vapour to gather in clouds and fall as rain.

  2. Alan Melbourne Avatar
    Alan Melbourne

    I take it that this type of aircraft will fly at low altitude where the vapour will soon form crystals and droplets. I fear that high altitude water vapour emission would add to the amount in that part of the atmosphere. Another question – what happens to the embodied energy in the oxygen gas released during electrolytic production of hydrogen?

    1. David Shaw Avatar
      David Shaw

      Hi Alan,
      Jet aircraft already emit a bunch of water vapour into the upper atmosphere – jet fuel is a mix of hydrocarbons, but I think it’s something like C12 H26 on average. All that hydrogen gets turned into water, and the carbon into carbon dioxide. Hydrogen planes would obviously emit much more water, but we should be able to estimate the effects pretty easily.

      More importantly, I don’t think water vapour lasts that long up in the upper atmosphere. Precipitation is quite effective at removing excess water vapour. If only there was a similar mechanism for CO2!

      As for the excess energy in manufactured oxygen, I don’t think it’s any different than from the oxygen released from photosynthesis or anywhere else. There’s a huge amount of chemical energy floating around in the air we breathe, and that’s just how Earth has been since the Oxygen Catastrophe, a billion years ago. There are plenty of planets and moons with lightning, but only one where lightning strikes cause bushfires!

  3. Alan Melbourne Avatar
    Alan Melbourne

    All correct, but, what I mean by the embodied energy is that we are pouring unergy into the electrolyser and then only using the portion in the hydrogen for useful work. The oxygen, if just released to the atmosphere, goes off with its share of the energy supplied in electrolysis. When we burn the hydrogen in the engine or the fuel cell, using atmospheric oxygen, we release some of the energy we supplied, but there must be a great overall inefficiency. I see bacterially produced synfuel as being a better flight propellant, Hydrogen’s best use would be for metal ore reduction and calcining of lime to make cement (where carbon fuels interfere with the equilibrium). The electrolytic oxygen should be captured for industrial and medical use. Nice chatting!!

    1. David Shaw Avatar
      David Shaw

      Hi Alan,
      Yup! While I’m hopeful that hydrogen will be a good way to store electricity for some needs, I think it’s even more compelling as a feedstock for chemical processes. We still need a smaller and lighter way to store hydrogen before it’ll be able to rival kerosene for general aviation.

      Using pure oxygen in your fuel cell probably makes it more efficient. But adding the weight of an oxidiser tank sounds pretty inefficient for a flying machine. Much better to send that oxygen to the nearest hospital or blast furnace.

      Thank you for a nice conversation!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By submitting this form, you give CSIRO permission to publish your comments on our websites. Please make sure the comments are your own. For more information please see our terms and conditions.

Why choose the Double Helix magazine for your students?

Perfect for ages 8 – 14

Developed by experienced editors

Engaging and motivating

*84% of readers are more interested in science

Engaging students voice